Funso OLOJO, Editor

The Federal Operations Unit (FOU), Zone A of the Nigeria Customs Service (NCS), has intercepted illicit drugs and other prohibited substances with a combined duty-paid value of N3.951 billion along trans-border routes within its area of operations.

The seizures, which included thousands of parcels of cannabis, tramadol tablets, codeine syrup and crystal methamphetamine, were handed over to the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA) for further investigation and prosecution.

The Unit also seized four cylinders of high-grade mercury, weighing 34.5kg each, allegedly intended for use in illegal gold mining.

The mercury was subsequently handed over to the National Environmental Standards and Regulations Enforcement Agency (NESREA).

Addressing journalists at the Unit’s headquarters in Lagos on Thursday, September 3rd, 2026, the Controller of FOU Zone A, Comptroller Gambo Aliu, said the seizures were the outcome of intelligence-driven operations and sustained surveillance along the nation’s trans-border routes.

Among the narcotics seized were 5,669 parcels and 19 sacks of synthetic cannabis sativa weighing 3,116.9kg; three-and-a-half packs of ground cannabis (Skunk) weighing 3.45kg; two packs of granulated cannabis (Skunk) weighing 1kg; and 11 small packs of granulated cannabis weighing 0.35kg.

Others were 24 packets of Backwoods Russian Cream cigars weighing 0.5kg; 49 wraps of cannabis (Skunk) weighing 26.1kg; and one wrap of crystal methamphetamine weighing 0.35kg.

The Unit also intercepted 1,754 packs and 6,948 sachets of tramadol tablets in 225mg and 100mg variants, 1,200 Hypnox tablets of 1mg each, and 97 bottles of codeine syrup.

Comptroller Aliu said the latest enforcement operation was deliberately targeted at drug-trafficking syndicates operating within the Unit’s jurisdiction, stressing that the illicit movement of narcotics and other dangerous substances posed grave threats to public health, national security and the future of Nigerian youths.

He described the handover of the seized items to the relevant agencies as evidence of the growing operational synergy among government agencies in the fight against trans-border crime.

“Today’s event is a practical demonstration of the commitment of the Nigeria Customs Service to national security, public health, environmental safety and the economic well-being of Nigerians.

“It also reflects the importance of strategic partnership in the fight against smuggling and other forms of trans-border crime,” Aliu said.

According to him, the Customs Service would continue to strengthen the integrity of the nation’s supply chain while supporting the NDLEA in disrupting the movement of narcotics and other illicit goods across Nigeria’s borders.

“We are equally committed to providing relevant information and supporting further investigation whenever necessary,” he added.

Aliu explained that the formal transfer of the narcotics to the NDLEA would enable the agency to undertake the necessary forensic, investigative and prosecutorial processes in accordance with the law.

He added that the procedure would also ensure that the seized drugs were handled, stored and disposed of securely and professionally.

On the mercury seizure, the FOU Controller said its transfer to NESREA would enable the agency to take appropriate regulatory and environmental action, particularly given the use of mercury in illegal mining activities.

While assuring Nigerians that the crackdown on illicit traders and trans-border criminal networks would continue, Aliu said the Unit would simultaneously facilitate legitimate trade and sustain collaboration with sister agencies.

“I wish to commend the leadership and personnel of the NDLEA and NESREA for their cooperation and professionalism.

“I also appreciate the support of all sister security and regulatory agencies whose contributions continue to strengthen our collective efforts,” he said.

Aliu warned smugglers and criminal networks that the FOU Zone A would not relent in its enforcement responsibilities.

“Let me reiterate that the Federal Operations Unit will not relent in its responsibilities. We will continue to deploy intelligence-driven strategies, enhanced surveillance, effective patrols and robust enforcement operations to disrupt the activities of smugglers and criminal networks,” he declared.

 Funso OLOJO, Editor

The Minister of Marine and Blue Economy, Adegboyega Oyetola, has ordered the transfer of the Inland Dry Port (IDP) functions currently domiciled in the Nigerian Shippers’ Council (NSC) to the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA), following the enactment of the Nigeria Ports Economic Regulatory Agency (NPERA) Act, 2026.

The directive is part of a broader restructuring of the agencies under the Federal Ministry of Marine and Blue Economy aimed at creating a clear separation between port economic regulation, infrastructure development and port operations.

Oyetola has also directed the immediate constitution of a ministerial committee to midwife the transition of the NSC into the newly established NPERA.

The move followed President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s assent to the NPERA Act in August, formally establishing a substantive statutory economic regulator for Nigeria’s port sector and ending a prolonged quest for a dedicated port economic regulatory institution.

Under the new arrangement, the NSC, which has functioned as Nigeria’s interim port economic regulator since 2014, will transmute into NPERA and concentrate on economic regulatory functions.

These include the regulation of port tariffs and charges, promotion of competition, licensing, enforcement of service standards, resolution of commercial disputes and protection of port users.

The Minister said the transition provides an opportunity to eliminate institutional overlaps and ensure that every responsibility within the port sector is domiciled in the agency with the appropriate statutory mandate.

“We must get the transition right. The establishment of NPERA is a landmark reform, and the process of moving from the Nigerian Shippers’ Council to the Nigeria Ports Economic Regulatory Agency must be carefully managed,” Oyetola said.

He explained that the ministerial committee would provide the necessary oversight to ensure a seamless transition and determine the appropriate institutional homes for functions that are not compatible with economic regulation.

According to him, the Federal Government’s objective is to ensure that NPERA is allowed to operate as an impartial economic regulator, free from operational, developmental or promotional responsibilities that could create actual or perceived conflicts of interest.

“The emergence of NPERA marks a new chapter in the governance of Nigeria’s port sector. It is therefore important that the new economic regulator is freed from functions that are not compatible with economic regulation.

“A regulator cannot function as an operator and, at the same time, be expected to be perceived as an unbiased referee,” the Minister said.

Oyetola said the transfer of the IDP functions to the NPA was therefore necessary to achieve a clearer delineation of responsibilities within the port system.

He stressed that the decision should not be construed as a withdrawal of the Federal Government’s commitment to the development of inland dry ports across the country.

Rather, he said, moving the promotion of IDPs to the NPA would strengthen the programme by bringing it under an institution with direct responsibility for port infrastructure and operations.

“We are committed to strengthening the development of the Inland Dry Ports by placing their promotion within the agency with the appropriate operational and infrastructure mandate.

“The ultimate objective is to create a more efficient and integrated port system that serves the entire country,” Oyetola added.

The Minister further stated that a clear separation of responsibilities would enhance transparency, strengthen confidence in Nigeria’s port regulatory architecture and create a more predictable operating environment for port users, investors, terminal operators, shipping companies and other stakeholders.

The restructuring is expected to redefine the institutional architecture of Nigeria’s port sector, with NPERA assuming the role of economic referee, while agencies such as the NPA take responsibility for infrastructure development and operational functions within their respective mandates.

The transition committee is expected to guide the process of disentangling the NSC’s existing functions, assets, responsibilities and institutional structures as the organisation moves into its new identity and mandate as NPERA.

Funso OLOJO, Editor 

At Nigeria’s south-western border with the Republic of Benin, the battle against smuggling is no longer merely about intercepting bags of rice, petroleum products or second-hand clothing.

Increasingly, it is a battle over the survival of local industries, food security, public health, legitimate trade, national revenue and, ultimately, Nigeria’s economic security.

At the centre of that battle is the Ogun I Area Command of the Nigeria Customs Service, Idiroko, where Deputy Comptroller Olukayode Oladapo Afeni, the Acting Customs Area Controller, has presided over an increasingly aggressive enforcement campaign.

The numbers tell part of the story.

Under Afeni, the Command’s seizure diary has expanded from narcotics and prohibited food products to petroleum products, tyres, pharmaceuticals, clothing, sugar, fertiliser and even antiquities and wildlife.

But perhaps more significant than the sheer volume of seizures is the philosophy emerging behind them: make the border hostile to illicit trade while making it more accessible to legitimate commerce.

That approach dovetails with the broader economic direction of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s administration, which has consistently presented the Renewed Hope agenda as a programme aimed at strengthening domestic production, protecting investment, improving revenue and securing Nigeria’s economic space.

At Ogun I, those objectives are increasingly being translated into frontline enforcement.

THE AUGUST SCORECARD: ₦3.574 BILLION IN ONE ENFORCEMENT WINDOW

The latest chapter in Afeni’s seizure diary is particularly revealing.
Between June 24 and August 13, 2026, the Ogun I Command intercepted prohibited goods with a combined Duty Paid Value of ₦3,574,435,248.08.

Among the most striking seizures were 6,035 parcels of Ghana Loud/Indica, 2,339 bags of foreign parboiled rice, 70 cartons of basmati rice, 30 bags of foreign sugar, 11,450 litres of Premium Motor Spirit in kegs, another 1,750 litres of PMS in drums and 30 kegs of diesel.

The inventory also included 100 bags of fertiliser, 67 bales of second-hand clothing, 2,674 pieces of new shorts and trousers, 3,760 pieces of new tops, 85 fire extinguishers, 480 cartons of Pure Haven drinks, cosmetics, oats, hair accessories, surgical shoes and 127 new purses.

Yet the cannabis seizure stood out.
The 6,035 parcels of Ghana Loud/Indica were formally handed over to the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency, NDLEA, Idiroko Special Command, for further investigation and necessary action.

Afeni subsequently disclosed that from January 2026 to the August briefing, the Command had handed over 32,412 parcels of hard drugs and 92 sacks of raw Cannabis Sativa to the NDLEA Idiroko Special Command.

That statistic provides perhaps the clearest indication of the changing character of smuggling through the Ogun border.

It is no longer simply a question of economic contraband. Increasingly, it is a question of economic and national security.

BEFORE AUGUST CAME ₦4.63 BILLION

The August seizure did not emerge in isolation.
Between April 1 and June 23, 2026, the Command recorded 146 seizures with a cumulative DPV of ₦4,628,591,970.16, while generating ₦259,777,346.89 during the same period.

The revenue figure represented a remarkable 238 per cent increase over the ₦76.81 million recorded during the corresponding period of 2025.

That performance is significant because the Ogun I story under Afeni has not been exclusively about seizure.

There has also been an attempt to combine enforcement, revenue generation and trade facilitation.

The second-quarter seizure list was extensive: 2,807 bags of foreign parboiled rice, 9,482 parcels of Cannabis Sativa, 62 sacks of raw marijuana, 16,525 litres of PMS, 475 litres of diesel, 7,642 pieces of footwear, 2,427 pneumatic tyres, 63 sacks of foreign sugar, 73 bales of second-hand clothing, fertiliser, imported flour, frozen products and pharmaceuticals.

The Command also handed over 6,981 parcels of Cannabis Indica/Ghanaian Loud and 62 sacks of raw marijuana to the NDLEA, while illicit pharmaceutical products, including 77 cartons of Analgin injections containing 138,600 tubes, were transferred to NAFDAC.

In other words, Afeni’s seizure diary is also becoming a diary of inter-agency enforcement.

THE ₦1.35 BILLION CHAPTER

Earlier, between February and March, the Command intercepted prohibited goods valued at approximately ₦1.35 billion.
That operation produced another revealing catalogue of commodities moving through the border environment.

They included 2,539 kegs of vegetable oil, 4,325 cartons of foreign spaghetti, 1,204 bags of foreign parboiled rice, 2,547 parcels of Cannabis Sativa and 13,625 litres of PMS.

Four live pangolins and two antique artefacts believed to date from the 19th century were also intercepted.The vegetable oil seizure was particularly significant.

Customs described it as part of efforts to protect domestic producers from unfair competition created by smuggled goods.

That is where the anti-smuggling campaign intersects directly with the Renewed Hope economic argument.

For every prohibited consignment that enters Nigeria outside the legal import regime, there is potentially a local manufacturer, farmer, investor or legitimate trader being placed at a disadvantage.

The Customs position, therefore, is that enforcement is not simply about confiscation. It is about protecting the productive economy.

THE RICE WAR

Foreign rice has perhaps become the most visible symbol of the economic contest at the Ogun border.

Again and again, rice appears in Afeni’s seizure diary.
In the April-June enforcement period alone, 2,807 bags of foreign parboiled rice were intercepted.

In the latest June-August operation, another 2,339 bags, alongside 70 cartons of basmati rice, were seized.

Afeni’s argument has been straightforward: the illegal inflow of foreign rice undermines local farmers, domestic rice mills and agricultural investors.

That position aligns the border enforcement campaign with the Federal Government’s broader food-security objectives.
The logic is compelling.

If government policy encourages Nigerians to invest in agriculture and local food processing while smugglers simultaneously flood the market with cheaper prohibited imports, then the border becomes the first point at which that economic policy must be defended.

In this sense, a bag of seized foreign rice is no longer merely a Customs seizure. It represents a direct intervention in the competition between illegal imports and domestic production.

WHEN SMUGGLERS FIGHT BACK

Afeni’s seizure diary also records an increasingly dangerous side of the border war.
In one June operation, Customs officers intercepted a truck carrying 113 bags of foreign parboiled rice along the Itori-Wasimi-Abeokuta corridor.

According to the Command, the driver ignored the officers’ signal to stop and attempted to ram the patrol vehicle before he was apprehended.

In another operation, 630 bags of foreign rice were intercepted along the Afamin-Igbogila axis.

Earlier enforcement operations had also involved resistance and attacks on Customs personnel.

This suggests that the enforcement environment around the Ogun border cannot be treated as an ordinary regulatory exercise.
The stakes are evidently high enough for some operators to risk confrontation with armed government personnel.

That makes the Command’s emphasis on intelligence, technology and collaboration with sister agencies particularly important.

FROM PATROLS TO INTELLIGENCE

Perhaps the most important change in the Afeni approach is the apparent movement away from purely reactive patrols towards intelligence-led enforcement.

The August operation, according to Customs, was strengthened by intelligence gathering, technology and collaboration with sister security agencies.

That is significant because border smugglers are themselves adapting.

Their methods increasingly involve concealment, multiple routes, small consignments, night movements, abandoned structures, bush paths and waterways.

The Customs response, therefore, has had to become more sophisticated.

The objective is no longer simply to wait for contraband to appear at a checkpoint. It is to identify the networks, understand the routes and intercept consignments before they reach the Nigerian market.

That represents a fundamentally different model of border enforcement.

BUT THERE IS ANOTHER SIDE TO THE STORY

Interestingly, while the seizure diary has expanded, so has the Command’s legitimate trade profile.

Between April and June, Ogun I facilitated 20,972 metric tonnes of exports with a Free-On-Board value of ₦1.049 billion — a dramatic improvement over the corresponding period of 2025, when no export activity was recorded.

By the August briefing, the Command reported 10,110 metric tonnes of exports, valued at ₦2.594 billion FOB, with white talc, crushed thermal coal and CNG identified among the major export commodities.

That development deserves attention.
A successful border command cannot simply become a wall. It must become a filter.
The illegal must be stopped; the legitimate must be facilitated.

So far, the figures suggest that Ogun I is attempting to pursue both sides of that equation.

THE AFENI EQUATION

The emerging Afeni equation can be reduced to four words:
Enforcement. Revenue. Security. Trade.

The enforcement figures are substantial.
The revenue numbers show improvement.
The volume of narcotics handed over to the NDLEA demonstrates the security dimension.

And the rising export statistics point towards the trade-facilitation component.

The interconnectedness of the four is clear.
A secure border encourages legitimate commerce.

Legitimate commerce generates revenue.
Revenue strengthens government capacity.
And strong enforcement protects legitimate operators from unfair competition.

This is the economic-security argument behind the Ogun I experience.

A COMMAND UNDER PRESSURE

Yet the Afeni record should not be romanticised. It should be understood for what it is.

The persistence of large-scale seizures itself demonstrates that the smuggling economy remains alive.

Every seizure is evidence of successful enforcement, but it is also evidence that somebody remains willing to attempt the illegal movement of the goods.

The continued appearance of rice, petroleum products, narcotics, clothing and other prohibited commodities means that the underlying economic incentives driving smuggling have not disappeared.

Perhaps this is where the larger policy question arises:
Can enforcement alone permanently defeat smuggling?
Probably not.

Border communities need legitimate economic alternatives. Traders need predictable procedures. Exporters need efficient processing. Security agencies need sustained inter-agency cooperation.

And the Customs Service must continue to ensure that legitimate trade is not inadvertently caught in an enforcement net designed for criminal networks.

Afeni’s challenge, therefore, is bigger than producing impressive seizure statistics.
It is to help transform Idiroko from a border corridor defined by illicit commerce into a gateway for legitimate Nigerian production and exports.

THE RENEWED HOPE TEST

The real test of the Renewed Hope agenda at the border is not how many bags of rice Customs can seize.

It is whether those seizures ultimately contribute to a market environment in which Nigerian farmers can produce competitively, local manufacturers can survive, legitimate traders can operate profitably, government can collect its lawful revenue and criminal networks can no longer exploit the border as an economic highway.

By that measure, Afeni’s diary offers an interesting case study.

From the ₦1.35 billion seizure chapter of February-March, to the ₦4.63 billion recorded between April and June, and then the ₦3.574 billion seizure window stretching from June 24 to August 13, the operational tempo has remained high.

And behind those numbers is an increasingly diversified enforcement portfolio: drugs, rice, petroleum products, vegetable oil, tyres, pharmaceuticals, clothing, sugar, fertiliser, wildlife and antiquities.

More importantly, the Command has coupled seizures with drug handovers, inter-agency operations, revenue collection and legitimate export facilitation.

That may ultimately prove more significant than any single seizure.

THE DIARY CONTINUES

As August 2026 closes, one conclusion appears difficult to dispute:
The Ogun I border is no longer being treated merely as a Customs collection point. It is increasingly being managed as an economic-security theatre.

For smugglers, the apparent message from Idiroko is unmistakable: the routes are being watched, the networks are being pursued and the cargoes are increasingly vulnerable to interception.

For legitimate businesses, however, there is another message: the border is expected to become a safer and more predictable channel for lawful commerce.

And for the Tinubu administration’s Renewed Hope agenda, that distinction is critical.
Because the ultimate measure of success is not the size of the seizure warehouse.

It is the size of the legitimate economy that emerges when the smuggling economy is squeezed out.
For now, Afeni’s seizure diary is still being written.
And at Idiroko, the pages are filling up fast.